Nepal Life Insurance Company has sent a letter of rebuttal to Banking Sansar, saying that its attention has been drawn to the news published on BankingSansar.com. The letter, signed by the company’s Chief Executive Officer Praveen Raman Parajuli, states that its attention has been drawn to the news published on BankingSansar.com.
CEO Parajuli has mentioned the headline of some news and claimed that those news are misleading. However, all these news are based on the truth. Surprisingly, CEO Parajuli had given a warning targeting the agitating agents in the company’s program, and he has also called the news of this warning misleading.
See the same as the rebuttal letter sent by the company’s CEO Praveen Raman Parajuli.
1. The company has alleged that BankingSansar.com did not make any response or attempt to understand the facts from the company before writing the news. However, the information officer of the company, Binod Kumar Bujel, was contacted repeatedly.
2. Our news that Nepal Life is in a ruckus, the regulator is silent is based on the truth. But this news is misleading by the company. There has been a scuffle between the agents of the company in the program, the CEO had to warn, the leader of the agent has been arrested by the police, and the video of the agents protesting outside the program venue is viral on social media. And how did our news written on this topic become misleading? Isn’t this like a joke made by Nepal Life Insurance in the name of refutation?
}3. How did the news of abuse without even reading the name of the media become misleading? Artha Sarokar has been abused by sharing a screenshot of the news published on Arthakhabar.com. An agent who does not know how to read the news and does not know how to read it, is it misleading to post the news that an unrelated media has been abused? Isn’t this another joke?
4. How did the news headline ‘Amit Phari’ controversy of Nepal Life become misleading? The letter of action taken by the Regulatory Insurance Authority against Nepal Life regarding the appointment of Amit Kayal is public. The fact that he took money to study MBA without due process is public. It is clear that the validity of the document signed by him was questioned even when his name was written wrongly. And how did this news become misleading?
5. It is a matter of the agents themselves admitting on social media that the insured has hesitated due to the controversy of Nepal Life. The insured have also called us and asked us. And how did it become misleading while writing news on this subject?
6. The fact that employees are not staying in the brand team of Nepal Life, good employees are out, Nepal Life has not paid the vendor’s money is clear to everyone. Is what everyone sees misleading? Why is the truth that the then CEO of Nepal Life Insurance, Santosh Prasai, did not pay even after the contract was completed? Do you not have to pay after the work is done? And is it not public that good employees have left their jobs? After Neupane in Nepal Life, Meghendra Giri, after him, Amit Jha again. After Amit, now Pranish Shakya. Is it said that the employees have stayed?
7. What is surprising is that the company has also said that the news of kicking in the award program, that the agent was taken away by the police, is misleading. Isn’t this something that embarrasses the onlookers rather than the doers? The video of the police taking the agent under control is public, isn’t it? The agent himself has given the statement of the kicking in public. Nepal Life itself has made public the pictures of the bouncers used in the program.
}8. After so much controversy, how did the news of Nepal Life become misleading? The news that the regulator’s family is in Nepal Life is misleading, while the people within the family of the boss of the Insurance Authority are employed in Nepal Life. And how did the news become misleading?
9. The news headlined “Miss Cell’s Net” in Nepal Life is also based on the truth. How many complaints have reached the regulator on this issue, how many have reached us? Can it be said that this topic of public debate is misleading when it is made news?
10. Don’t pick up the phone when you call before publishing the news, get away with the pretext that there is a program, and now that the news is misleading? Is this right?
We are clear that all the news about Nepal Life published on BankingSansar.com is based on facts. It would have been better if CEO Saap, who called the news misleading in refutation, had also sent what is right!
